Term II: US must help poor, elderly, Obama says
by JULIE PACE, AP White House Correspondent
Jan 21, 2013 | 3461 views | 22 22 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
President Barack Obama speaks at the ceremonial swearing-in at the U.S. Capitol during the 57th Presidential Inauguration in Washington, Monday, Jan. 21, 2013. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
President Barack Obama speaks at the ceremonial swearing-in at the U.S. Capitol during the 57th Presidential Inauguration in Washington, Monday, Jan. 21, 2013. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
slideshow
WASHINGTON (AP) - Declaring "our journey is not complete," President Barack Obama took the oath of office for his second term before a crowd of hundreds of thousands Monday, urging the nation to set an unwavering course toward prosperity and freedom for all its citizens and protect the social safety net that has sheltered the poor, elderly and needy.

"Our country cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely make it," Obama said in his relatively brief, 18-minute address. "We believe that America's prosperity must rest upon the broad shoulders of a rising middle class," he added, echoing his calls from the presidential campaign that catapulted him to re-election.

The president declared that a decade of war is ending, as is the economic recession that consumed much of his first term.

The inaugural fanfare spread across the capital Monday, with an inaugural parade down Pennsylvania Ave. and two glitzy inaugural balls. The president also lunched with lawmakers in the Capitol following his address.

Before diving into the afternoon celebrations, Obama previewed an ambitious second-term agenda, devoting several sentences to the threat of global climate change and saying that failure to confront it "would betray our children and future generations." Obama's focus on climate change was notable given that he barely dealt with the issue in his first term.

In an era of looming budget cuts, he said the nation has a commitment to costly programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. "These things do not sap our initiative, they strengthen us," he said.

Sandwiched between the bruising presidential campaign and relentless fiscal fights, Monday's inaugural celebrations marked a brief respite from the partisan gridlock that has consumed the past two years. Perhaps seeking a fresh start, Obama invited several lawmakers to the White House for coffee before his speech, including the Republican leaders with whom he has frequently been at odds.

Among then was the Senate's top Republican, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. In a statement following Obama's swearing-in, McConnell said the president's second term represented "a fresh start when it comes to dealing with the great challenges of our day."

Looking ahead to those challenges, Obama implored Congress to find common ground over the next four years. And seeking to build on the public support that catapulted him to the White House twice, the president said the public has "the obligation to shape the debates of our time."

"Not only with the votes we cast, but with the voices we lift in defense of our most ancient values and enduring ideals," Obama said.

Moments earlier, Obama placed his hand on two Bibles - one used by the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and the other by Abraham Lincoln - and recited the brief oath of office. Michelle Obama held the Bibles, one on top of the other, as daughters Malia and Sasha looked on.

Vice President Joe Biden was also sworn in for his second term as the nation's second in command. Former Presidents Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter, several Cabinet secretaries and dozens of lawmakers were on hand to bear witness to history.

Monday's oaths were purely ceremonial. The Constitution stipulates that presidents begin their new terms at noon on Jan. 20, and in keeping with that requirement, Obama was sworn in Sunday in a small ceremony at the White House. Because inaugural celebrations are historically not held on Sundays, organizers pushed the public events to Monday, the same day the nation marked the late civil rights leader King's birthday.

Obama soaked in the history on a day full of traditions as old as the Republic. Gazing over the crowd before retreating into the Capitol, he said "I want to take a look, one more time. I'm not going to see this again."

After a stunning sunrise, the weather for the swearing-in and parade was chilly - upper 30s rising into the lower 40s - and overcast.

Once the celebrations subside, Obama will be confronted with an array of pressing priorities: an economy still struggling to fully a recover, the fiscal fights with a divided Congress, and new threats of terrorism in North Africa. The president has also pledged to tackle immigration reform and stricter gun laws in the wake of the school shootings in Newtown, Conn., - sweeping domestic reforms that will require help from reluctant lawmakers.

Obama is also facing fresh concerns about terrorism in North Africa. In the midst of the inaugural celebrations, a U.S. official said two more Americans died in Algeria, bringing the U.S. death toll from a four-day siege at a natural gas plant to three. Seven Americans survived, the official said.

The president did not offer any specific prescriptions for addressing the challenges ahead, though he is expected to offer more detail in his Feb. 12 State of the Union address.

Asserting "America's possibilities are limitless," he declared at the Capitol: "My fellow Americans, we are made for this moment, and we will seize it, so long as we seize it together."

"We must make the hard choices to reduce the cost of health care and the size of our deficit," he said. "But we reject the belief that America must choose between caring for the generation that built this country and investing in the generation that will build its future."

Obama's second inaugural lacked the electric enthusiasm of his first, when 1.8 million people crammed onto the National Mall to witness the swearing-in of the nation's first black president. Far fewer people attended this year's inauguration - officials estimated up to 700,000 people - but the crowd still stretched from the Capitol to the Washington Monument. And shortly before the president spoke, U.S. Park Police announced that the public viewing areas on the Mall were full.

Security was tight across Washington, with streets closed off for blocks around the White House and Capitol Hill. Military Humvees and city buses were being used to block intersections. Volunteers fanned out near the Mall to help direct the crowds.

David Richardson of Atlanta and his two young children were among the early-goers who headed to the Mall before sunrise.

"We wanted to see history, I think, and also for the children to witness that anything is possible through hard work," Richardson said.

Wendy Davis of Rome, Ga., was one of thousands of inaugural attendees who packed Metro trains. Davis came four years ago as well but was among the many ticketholders who couldn't get in then because of the massive crowds.

"I thought I was early last time, but I obviously wasn't early enough," she said.

By 8 a.m. thousands of people were also waiting in security lines that stretched a block to gain access to the spots along the parade route that were accessible to the general public without a special ticket.

The cold weather was easily tolerated by Marie-France Lemaine of Montreal, who received the trip to the inaugural as a birthday present from her husband. She headed up an Obama advocacy group in Quebec that cheered on the president from north of the border.

"The American president affects the rest of the world," she said.

___

Associated Press writers Darlene Superville, Matt Barakat, Alan Fram, Donna Cassata, Jim Kuhnhenn, Mary Clare Jalonick and Nancy Benac contributed to this report.
Comments
(22)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Termlimits
|
January 26, 2013
S&P 500 closes above 1500 for the first time since 2007, also posting its longest win streak since 2004. Clearly, this is all Obama's fault.

the.jury
|
January 26, 2013
Obama has NOTHING to do with this!!! It kills me that the "dumb" wings cry about corporations ruining the US, but are the first to point out when the street does well. WTF?? Either you're ignorant to what you voted for, or you're stupid for whom you voted for. Ignorance is forgivable....stupidity is NOT! Don't try to give praise to him by way of sarcasm.
wheninrome
|
January 26, 2013
the.jury,

Open your eyes to the recovery. Obama has everything to do with this. Your paintbrush of hate is painting strokes that are too broad. It's not corporations in general that any Democrat has a problem with; it's the lack of taxation through tax breaks and incentives for companies that don't need the breaks and show billions of dollars in profits.

Slowly open your eyes if a wide open view is too much for you to handle. Perhaps sunglasses will help, but either way Obama is pulling us out of the hole.
the.jury
|
January 26, 2013
So which corporations do you have a problem with??

"It's not corporations in general that any Democrat has a problem with; it's the lack of taxation through tax breaks and incentives for companies that don't need the breaks and show billions of dollars in profits."

This is as ridiculous as it gets!! Without tax breaks, the companies couldn't afford to employ...OH...That's right, we should just live off of the government at $300 a week and be happy. I have greater expectations for my fellow Americans, so forgive me if I don't see the faded colors of YOUR brush. If you started a company, wouldn't you want the profits you deserve?

wheninrome
|
January 26, 2013
the.jury

You're "living on handouts, $300 a week" blah, blah, blah bores me to death and quite frankly speaks to the ignorance you mentioned so deftly above. Wake up, friend. There are democrats that earn as much or more than you. Again, if you open your eyes you'll see that it is not only welfare recipients that vote for Obama (and common sense.)

It is those common sense voters who see an industry, not a company, that reports BILLIONS in profits, and continues to gouge its customers. They see the millions paid to lobbies to ensure those tax breaks exist...and those millions are a drop in the bucket, call it a Cost of Goods Sold, to ensure that they continue to receive more breaks.

We EXPORTED more oil in 2011 than we imported. That deserves repeating. America EXPORTED more oil in 2011 than we imported.

Supply and demand is taught in Economics 101. Surplus obviously exists if we are exporting, even the.jury wouldn't argue that. The issue is that price drops when supply is high and demand is low, but that is not the case with the price of gas.

And we give them tax breaks, incentives, free land, and subsidies. We fight laws that would cause them to do less damage to the environment while they rape us financially at the pump.

So to answer your questions directly: Marathon, Holly Frontier, Tesoro and any number of bigger name oil companies.

And there is no hypothetical "if I started my own company." I have. I earn my living through running them. And I don't get a single break, no one gives me land, and the only incentive I get is...well, none. You and I are not that big, friend. It's those whose bad days at the market affect the whole nation that I/we am/are concerned with.

And when we're talking about the big boys, I don't think meeting the payroll is an issue even though you think that they "couldn't pay their employees" without tax breaks.

It's bad. You'll get it at some point. Hopefully it won't be too late. Good luck with your quest to understand the reality that we live in.
wheninrome
|
January 25, 2013
It must be depressing to hear that your party is pulling back to punt. It must not be fun to hear your proclaimed socialist leader's name in the same conversation as FDR, Kennedy, et. al. It must feel like the world has gone mad when it's common knowledge that your political beliefs are amassed into a single, negative demographic description: old, stuffy white men.

Indeed, it must physically hurt when the numbers show success. Hindsight, being so perfect as it is, shows "We can keep our CHANGE," hasn't worked out so well as a motto. Instead, it has been adopted by the Jindal's of your party, in hopes of a revival. Yet, revival isn't the proper term as you've come to realize. Revival implies something being brought back to life. In this case, the "something" is a set of ideals that have no hope of being revived; only an outside chance of being CHANGED to suit the real world.

So, despite your proclamations to reject our CHANGE, it seems that you may need to take a sip of our fountain. Don't be scared...the taste is sweet, with hints of equality, and a distinct aroma of success.

When you reply, don't be predictable. Socialism, handouts, and other anti-POTUS buzzwords bore me. Please think for yourself - a novel idea, and a tall order I realize, but one that will set you free.
FormerRomanJr.
|
January 25, 2013
Hope you're ready when the bills come due..

Take note of Spain's 26% unemployment-Have a vision?..Folks are going to flee from the states with high rates of taxation-Phil Mickelson is outta' California after being a spokesman for the state..Their gas tax is almost 50 cents per gallon as is New York..Those states have anything in common?..The Haves don't mind helping the Have Nots, they just don't want to be their soul source of income.
wheninrome
|
January 25, 2013
Those states have a democratic vote in common...it's OK to say it. It's real whether you elude to it or actually type it. The question is what do WE have in common with them? Billionaire towers?

When the same $200k home in Georgia costs $1.3 million Cali/NY, I would say that we are not comparing apples to apples, friend. Those guys paying a whopping $.50 more for gas is the least of their worries. And for you to imply that Donald Trump in NY or a Kardashian in Cali is going to setup camp in Omaha in defiance is...let's call it misled and leave it at that.

The one (only) intriguing thing you wrote here is the first statement. I may be giving you too much credit, but it seems that your first sentence is a veiled threat regarding the debt ceiling. The mighty GOP will take their football and go home if Obama doesn't listen to them. THAT IS THE MOST UNAMERICAN POSITION I have ever heard, but sadly that's not the first time. This Congress that includes both blue and red created these "bills" that are coming due. And just as you may regret that F350 you financed, you still pay the loan payment each month vowing to make better decisions in the future.

Backed into a corner, any dog will bite. I guess that's the only way I can rationalize Republicans saying that they would rather demolish our economic standing in the world, and in turn our economy rather than compromise.

I abhor that threat, but it only shows the desperation of a dying party.
FormerRomanJr.
|
January 25, 2013
Obama called Bush's debt "Unpatriotic" when running in 2008-Yet he has more than doubled it in 4 years..Sure, America has to pay her bills, but let's be reasonable here..

Someone has to pay the credit card bills when they come due..The debt projections also don't include Social Security or Medicare which are leaking dollars.

States with lower tax rates are seeing the most growth as companies flee..

I welcome a reasonable response to the freebies being handed out in the most taxed states.
wheninrome
|
January 26, 2013
H Boy, H boy, H boy. It may be best for you to return to your video games while we adults discuss "big boy" topics.

Does anyone else find irony in a boy who implies superior intelligence by judging someone else's intelligence by the way they look?

On second thought, you should put down the video game controller and pick up a book.
wheninrome
|
January 26, 2013
FormerRomanJr,

Calling debt unpatriotic and slamming America into a brick wall at 80 mph are not the same thing at all. This is what will happen in effect if the debt ceiling isn't raised. I'm talking action, not words here.

As for the debt projections: perhaps you don't work, or perhaps you are immune to the Social Security tax, but my paycheck just took a $50 hit because the SS contribution by employee raised to 6.2% rather than 4.2%. If the debt gets a $100 contribution each month in the name of Social Security tax from little ol' me, I imagine we're headed in the right direction as a nation regarding Social Security reform. Some don't understand this. In fact, my co-workers slammed Obama for raising taxes when they saw the difference in their checks (we're salaried, so we expect the same amount each pay period.) It was a little-discussed Bush tax cut that expired and wasn't renewed, and as much as I hate the lower paycheck, it is a step in the right direction for helping Social Security, or if you're a Republican "entitlement" reform.

You wrote "I welcome a reasonable response to the freebies being handed out in the most taxed states."

I would love to respond reasonably, but please clarify what you're saying. I'm not sure what you are asking.

WWrome
|
January 22, 2013
OMG, what a bunch of racist morons. Bet you are all good Christians, eh? Jesus sure spent a lot of time helping the poor and unfortunate--and not a lot of time judging.

Bet none of you pay much in taxes either.
Termlimits
|
January 22, 2013
Financial equivalents of Mad Max's nitrous oxide booster system.
Termlimits
|
January 21, 2013
Uncle Remus! Next post: Chemistry. Stand back -- he's gonna do SCIENCE
Termlimits
|
January 21, 2013
Johnnie One-note fade into your clouded personal misconceptions for 1461 more days.
JoMadden
|
January 21, 2013
So it closed Friday at about what it was 8 months before Obama took office. Does anyone happen to know the number of jobs created since Obama took office? Does anyone happen to know the number of people who have gone on food stamps since Obama took office? Does anyone know if taxes only went up on the rich under Obama? S&P must love no job growth, more people on the public dole and high taxes.
Termlimits
|
January 21, 2013
Set your faces to stunned: S&P Average P/E--1 year change 13.60%
Watchingit
|
January 22, 2013
Anyone checked the markets this morning? Dow 13,631.23 -18.47; Nasdaq -10.88; S&P -3.82
Watchingit
|
January 22, 2013
My point exactly with my post yesterday – just pointing it out today. May be up or down by 5:00pm closing.
Watchingit
|
January 21, 2013
Today was a Market holiday and they were closed for the weekend, so you are looking at Friday’s 5:00pm close? Maybe before we celebrate, we need to follow the Market on a daily or even a weekly basis as US and world events unfold.
Termlimits
|
January 21, 2013
dbeall - Looks like the S&P500 loves socialism.

And you weird enough to be in a traveling circus.

dbeall
|
January 21, 2013
US must help poor, elderly:

Code for "I will not stop taxing you until we have a 100% tax rate and wealth is totally controlled by the government,and my vision of turning the US into a socialist utopia is realized.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.