Tennis Center on radar as possible SPLOST project
by Jeremy Stewart, Staff Writer
Mar 01, 2013 | 5117 views | 48 48 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Chuck Scragg (center, back) serves as facilitator for the two-day planning retreat for Rome City Commission members and city staff at WinShape Center. (Jeremy Stewart, RN-T.com)
Chuck Scragg (center, back) serves as facilitator for the two-day planning retreat for Rome City Commission members and city staff at WinShape Center. (Jeremy Stewart, RN-T.com)
slideshow
Chuck Scragg (right), who served as facilitator for the Rome City Commission's two-day planning retreat at WinShape Center at Berry, talks with commissioners Buzz Wachsteter and Bill Irmscher. (Jeremy Stewart, RN-T.com)
Chuck Scragg (right), who served as facilitator for the Rome City Commission's two-day planning retreat at WinShape Center at Berry, talks with commissioners Buzz Wachsteter and Bill Irmscher. (Jeremy Stewart, RN-T.com)
slideshow
Residents could vote this November on giving a four-year-old development plan a serious shot in the arm, if the Rome City Commission gets its wish.

The proposed Tennis Center of Georgia at Berry College was mentioned Thursday as the board discussed possible projects to be considered as part of the city’s recommendation for the upcoming SPLOST referendum.

The talk happened during the second day of the City Commission’s two-day planning retreat at WinShape at Berry College.

Proposed to include 82 courts and cost an estimated $18.7 million, the tennis complex would be built on 30 acres donated by Berry College along the Armuchee Connector near Mount Berry Square mall.

Attempts at obtaining $7.5 million in state economic bonds to jump-start the development have been shot down each of the last four legislative sessions, including the current one.

“If you’re going to put all your chips on the state, this will never get built,” Rome Mayor Evie McNiece said. “If we’re going to do something like this, we’re going to have to do it ourselves.”

Commissioners Bill Irmscher and Jamie Doss voiced their approval of trying to get the center on the SPLOST list, and the general consensus among the board was to submit it as part of the city’s recommendation.

A 2009 study estimated the center could host as many as 35 multi-day tennis events a year, with an annual economic impact of more than $28 million.

“I don’t think we can comprehend how much this would do for our community,” Assistant City Manager Sammy Rich said. “Short of a massive private donation — which is unlikely — SPLOST is the only way we’re going to get it done.”

City Manager John Bennett said it would be better if they could go into the SPLOST vote with a plan on how to avoid a deficit for the first few years created by operating costs.

The worry that Rome may have missed the opportunity to complete the center after it had been so long in limbo led to the mention that other cities in Georgia have looked at this and are considering building similar facilities.

While Rome officials do plan on making a presentation to the Rome-Floyd SPLOST Citizen Committee once it begins meeting, Bennett made it clear that the projects discussed Thursday were not the final list.

The SPLOST committee will review all submissions for projects or equipment to be covered by a new 1-cent special purpose, local option sales tax and will recommend a package. Elected officials would have the final say on what appears on the Nov. 5 ballot.

Purchasing and developing new sites for industry was brought up as a need that a SPLOST could help fill.

“If we’re going to be competitive with the rest of the world, we’ve got to have more land designated for industrial use,” Bennett said.

While the new Lowe’s Distribution Center on Ga. 53 was a big get for the city, it will end up filling nearly half of the industrial land on the site, according to Bennett.

He said the city had no large sites that were “shovel ready,” meaning developed with utility service.

“It goes without saying that we need to have some sites for industrial development because the county has to grow,” Commission Buzz Wachsteter said. “We need to go after this for the SPLOST.”

Wachsteter made reference to the former site of Northwest Georgia Regional Hospital on Division Street as a possible site for industry.



“We’ve got 120 acres inside the city that has water, sewer, electricity and rail access and there is no movement on it,” he said.

“That’s a very strategic piece of property that we need to move on and not wait around to see what the state does with it,” Bennett said.
Comments
(48)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
DedicatedParent
|
March 05, 2013
Tennis center? Really???? How about a SPLOST to repair potholes on city streets? How about a SPLOST to feed the homeless? How about a SPLOST to prevent home forclosures? How about a SPLOST that actually creates jobs AND benefits someone other than the dillweeds who run this community and their buddies? I didn't think so. We have a world of problems and these buttheads want money to play tennis? Holy crap.
AnotherPatriot
|
March 03, 2013
Dalton75 has the right plan but it obviously is lost on local law enforcement. There are 1000's of dollars lost everyday on the streets of Rome and Floyd County due to unenforced traffic laws. And while it may be unpopular with most, that's due to the fact that they are in fear of getting caught. The lawful driver doesn't care.
romegolfer
|
March 03, 2013
I think you are correct Who?_Me?, I am old enough to remember a SPLOST to four lane Shorter Avenue along with a turning lane. Now I consider that an appropriate use for the special option sales tax. I believe that everyone in Floyd County eventually uses Shorter Avenue some time in their lives.
onemansthoughts
|
March 03, 2013
I just don't see the voters approving a tennis center and/or an aquatic center. Maybe we should consider maintainance and upkeep to our existing facilities.
tullock
|
March 03, 2013
Upkeep for tennis courts is a big deal. They always seem to need an expensive resurfacing or repair.
crankyascanbe
|
March 03, 2013
While we're at it, let's build a Yugioh and a Pokemon Center for disadvantaged card players while we're at it. Just imagine....thousands of nerds converging on Rome, spending millions of dollars on things like polka dotted Disney pink underwear and breath mints in Broccoli and Asparagus flavoring!

ribeyes
|
March 03, 2013
Yes the budgets are public information.
Who?_Me?
|
March 03, 2013
I'll be the first to admit that I seldom understand the methods to governmental madness, but I really wish someone would explain this one to me. I thought the way SPLOSTs worked was that WHEN the city or county identified a need - such as a community center or roadwork or whatever - for which there was no funding, they would THEN ask the voters to approve a SPLOST for that specific ALREADY-IDENTIFIED need. Am I incorrect in that notion?

Now, apparently the Rome City Commission has formed a committee to FIND SOMEthing to spend proposed SPLOST money on, even though it hasn't been voted on so they don't have it and have no guarantee that they will get it? Am I understanding that correctly?

If not, would someone please explain what I'm missing? If I am understanding correctly, would someone please explain how this makes any sense at all??

It looks to me like the Rome City Commissioners just fell off that unicorn-drawn turnip truck they rode in on!! Sheesh!!
romemom32
|
March 02, 2013
Are the County Budgets public information? Shouldn't we all look at what is creating $$ and build on those programs/items?

Who knows what makes the most $$ for Floyd County?

Someone, please tell me.
dalton75
|
March 02, 2013
That's easy. Law enforcement is the largest money maker in Rome and Floyd County hands down.

Buy a couple of dozen police cars and hire some traffic enforcement officers to write legitimate speeding, improper lane change, no turn signal, no brake light, running light, tag light, broken windshield, broken or burned out headlight, worn out tires, no license, no insurance etc. and we could probably cut property tax and pay for anything we want with no more SPLOST or LOST taxes of anykind with 4 percent state sales tax only.
LimitGovernment
|
March 04, 2013
Lock'em all up Dalton75, Lock'em all up!

Rich property owners love paying Room, Board, and Medical for our prisoners and our over booked courts......... Lock'em UP!!!

dalton75
|
March 04, 2013
Lgovt,

Did you read my comment or do you just have a reading comprehension problem?

Traffic tickets for speeding, improper equipment, and other moving violations don't generally get you locked up unless you attempt to elude the officer when they attempt to pull you over.

Now go attack somebody else.
Parapro12
|
March 01, 2013
And the Chamber gang know this SPLOST is DOA. They are swamping this article's comments. Look to the Chamber to recruit USTA, Contractors, vendors, and anyone else that stands to make money on this project (Plus the GE deal). There will be a mass marketing blitz. In the end, these tennis courts will be nothing but another Stonebridge moneypit. But the project was set in motion long ago. That's why the "Armuchee bypass" leads directly to the proposed land vs emptying out on Hwy 53 like it was originally designed
romegolfer
|
March 01, 2013
Gee ..... Golf and Tennis will save Floyd County. I believe that 2012 was the first year that Stonebridge wasn't in the hole. Will it take that long for these tennis courts to show a profit?
TheSeer
|
March 01, 2013
Stonebridge brings in hundreds of thousands of dollars in property taxes every year from the houses built in those adjoining subdivisions--money that would not be there if the golf course wasn't there. When that is considered, Stonebridge has made money every year.
tullock
|
March 01, 2013
Most if not all of those folks would still pay property taxes by building or buying houses elsewhere in the city or county. A money pit is a money pit.
3isEnough
|
March 01, 2013
The new mall owners have begged the city to develop retail in the area to draw more shoppers. Instead, the city powers-that-be are interested in developing a new shopping center across from Ridge Ferry Park, and a new one on the old GE property on Redmond. Never mind that Garden Lakes has a near empty shopping plaza on Shorter/Huffaker and another near empty plaza across from the former GE plant (right down the street from the new proposed shopping plaza). The powers-that-be obviously have the ear of developers than know they can only profit if they project is OK'd. And really, how are 82 new tennis courts going to help our city year-round? Maybe the complex will work if they add a Mexican restaurant.
TheSeer
|
March 01, 2013
The location at Shorter Avenue and Huffaker is no good as is the current Mall location because they are geographically undesirable. Rome shoppers have shown repeatedly that they want to shop and eat in the Turner McCall corrider. That is why that area and downtown Rome are successful and most locations in other areas are not. People will flock to the proposed Ledbetter development. Any other location will fail.
FormerRomanJr.
|
March 05, 2013
Beware Floyd County-My county has a storm water runoff tax..It was just upheld in the courts..All property owners pay this fee twice a year-60 dollars total..Another great Democratic idea.
quacker
|
March 01, 2013
I will not vote for a tax that will give wealthy Berry students a job at this center. I'm not going to do it!

Take Berry College out of this equation and then we'll talk.
wheninrome
|
March 01, 2013
If you take Berry college out of the equation, you don't have land, friend. They are donating it for free.
quacker
|
March 01, 2013
Berry College is not donating it for free. In exchange for the land, they have the rights to manage and staff the facility. Forever and ever.

romanempire
|
March 02, 2013
I heard this issue raised a couple of years ago and, if true, would certainly give me pause to support the project. Ran into a CVTA official at dinner tonight who said this claim is totally false.

The Management of the Center would be by a separate non-profit Board set up to blend city and county officials, private citizens and, as far as this person was told, 1 member who represents Berry out of about 15-20 board members.
tullock
|
March 02, 2013
Berry students, with a few exception, are not wealthy. Many are first generation college kids and more than 20 pct are PELL grant recipients.

Not saying you should vote for the center--not saying I would vote for it--but get your facts right.
quacker
|
March 02, 2013
OK, I'll retract. But since some of you know more than I do, what exactly is in it for Berry?

Nothing? I doubt that.

Berry, a private college, has wanted to enhance its work-study program and ability to recruit future students.

All well, fine and good...as long as private money supports Berry in this manner. Any future SPLOST need not apply.
tedb3rd
|
March 01, 2013
WOW! $28 Million!? With such a guaranteed profit/revenue income like that, it makes you wonder why some private business-owner isn't willing to cough up the required funds to get it built in exchange for a piece of the returns! ...Oh wait, maybe it's because private-business owners tend not to be IDIOTS and those who are promoting EIGHTY-TWO tennis courts in a community that can't sustain a mall beyond 16% capacity ARE IDIOTS. (Just a guess.)

Why don't we just use the existing Mt. Berry mall (that was former-Berry land too)... You could build 82 (if not more) INDOOR tennis courts in the vacant stores in the mall. BAM--no need for SPLOST.

...and we WONDER why we can't afford teachers...
romanempire
|
March 01, 2013
A valid question on private investment - one I asked of several people directly involved in the project and was told in fact at least 4 private equity funds and investment companies have OFFERED to get involved and bring money to the project.

However, those firms require being paid back with accelerated interest which then saddles the project with a hefty debt service that overrides the tax revenue generated. Plus, apparently they asked for discounted first options on adjacent land to have control of any commercial development that would come - i.e. hotel, retail, etc.

And the new Mall owners would have to be jumping for joy at the thought of this being funded and built - I don't think it's a stretch to suggest it would be good for business to bring that many people to a facility right next door.
heffalump
|
March 01, 2013
Sad thing is, the commission will find some way to do this on our dime. Or pennies. "2009 study shows the tennis center COULD host as many as 35 multi day tennis events per year", if it's not a guaranteed annual economic impact of 28 million, that we won't catch any kind of a break from, NO MORE TAXES.
Starfish12
|
March 01, 2013
How can you talk about building a tennis center for 18 million when we just lost 119 Educators. Come on get real!!!
serpenttoe
|
March 01, 2013
Starfish12

Tennis court or a SPLOST referendum has no relationship to 119 educators losing their jobs.

The educators lost their job because the Georgia Legislature has cut over $5 BILLION from public education over the past 10 years.And every session, they invet new ways to drain money away from public education. This is wrong and we need to hold our state legislators accountable.

But just because public education is suffering because of poor decisions in the Legislature, that doen't mean you should be against a SPLOST even before you have heard the proposal. I would think that people who support teachers and public education would be a little more open-minded than that.
romanempire
|
March 01, 2013
The Tennis Center does have some relation to city and county tax revenues - although you are correct the RIF was less a matter of local tax coffers and more about state budgets.

Tourism from this type of facility, if built, would drive sales taxes and hotel/motel taxes, support businesses and bring commercial development to support the facility. That's not counting vacant land that is taxed nominally being converted to retail, hospitality, etc. and the value of the real estate going up - i.e. the taxable value of property going up which also brings in more tax revenue. Not to mention the spending of visitors at established local businesses.

It would undoubtedly put additional tax revenue in the bank for our local governments, if built.
snapshots
|
March 01, 2013
In a perfect world.. all peaches and cream, romanempire but as we well know, past "recreational" endeavors have been a drain instead of income building for the area. It also promotes lower paying jobs (hotel or food service) instead of skilled workers. These projects such as the Baron or the Forum, do not raise the median income for the area..which would be a much better benefit to the community. Bottom line, it would take a LOT of time to recoup 18 million back to the taxpayers, if they ever actually did.
romanempire
|
March 01, 2013
True - but building economic growth has to start somewhere and it doesn't typically start with high income - high skill jobs unless you have the workers to attract those companies and the location they desire to supply a continual employee pool.

And, from reading the previous stories about what is already committed it wouldn't be a SPLOST for the entire $18M. There is already a fairly substantial amount of money in hand/pledged including the land which is why they only asked the state for $7.5M.

I don't know that I will vote for it or against - but at least thinking we need to do something. We've been in a negative growth curve here for 7 years. I plan on at least listening.
Starfish12
|
March 01, 2013
Go by the Rome tennis center any time of day or night those Courts never have people on them. Lights on alto park and nobody playing. Just saying Rome needs something more than tennis courts for a few people to play on. Can not count on tournaments they may come or not!!
Prossarian
|
March 01, 2013
“It goes without saying that we need to have some sites for industrial development because the county has to grow,” Commission Buzz Wachsteter said. “We need to go after this for the SPLOST.”

What about that big old Industrial Park on 27 South that is at about 25% capacity? Do you think we are all that stupid not to see the waste this county has already created with Industrial parks? These commissioners obviously do not realize that times are tough and just throwing a bunch of hair-brained items together to have a SPLOST is an incredible waste of time and money. We do not need a Tennis Center or a new industrial park. We need the county to utilize the tax money they have access to efficiently. It's really getting time to clean house and let the citizens voices be heard. I will oppose any SPLOST that does not enhance the quality of life for every single citizen in this community instead of the special interest groups that want tennis courts and industrial parks...

drdewrag
|
March 01, 2013
Still D. O. A.
MikeLReynolds
|
March 01, 2013
I do not know the restrictions on use of SPLOST funds but here are some suggestions for alternative uses of SPLOST money that would positively impact the quality of life in our community.

An extension of affordable high speed internet into our rural areas. Recall the REA?

Replacement of teachers just laid off.

Establish a Federally Qualified Community Health Center in South Rome.

Create a contemporary CCC for unemployed young adults, staffed by Vets, and rebuilding roads, schools, bridges, working on conservation projects, and learning the joy of disciplined achievement.

We could bring several advanced manufacturing experts from outside Georgia to live in Rome for two to three years to stimulate new ideas and strategies for making Floyd County a desirable place for high value added businesses that pay livable wages.

The tennis set has plenty of destination options and they will not select Rome. If Berry College wants to build a tennis center, the institution has access to about $1 billion in internal and external endowment.

Michael L. Reynolds

Rome, Ga
quacker
|
March 02, 2013
Right you are, Mr. Reynolds!
snapshots
|
March 01, 2013
If they put that on the ballot it won't have a chance. Period. If these tennis courts were going to be such a great money maker, why isn't some private entity jumping at this development?
onemansthoughts
|
March 01, 2013
Instead of looking at new projects for SPLOST why not focus on improvements to existing facilities. Improvements to the City Auditorium and the Forum both are long overdue.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.