Alcohol vendors face possible new punishment for violations
by Alan Riquelmy, Staff Writer
Mar 21, 2013 | 3166 views | 7 7 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Joe Smith
Joe Smith
slideshow
A new punishment for Rome businesses that violate alcohol laws has not yet been used, though if history is any indication it’s likely only a matter of time.

The new censure, approved by the City Commission in February, allows commissioners to fine non-compliant businesses. Previously, the commission could only warn a business, suspend its alcohol license or even revoke it, said City Clerk Joe Smith.

“A lot of times, it causes major hardships to the business itself, as well as the other employees if they have to close,” said Mayor Evie McNiece of license suspensions.

That potential hardship changed when the commission approved the new punishment Feb. 11.

The most common violation is selling alcohol to someone younger than 21, though noise complaints have brought business owners before the city’s Alcohol Control Commission as well, Smith added. “It’s open ended,” Smith told ACC members at their Monday meeting. “Whatever fine you think is appropriate, you can recommend.”

The commission ultimately decides what fine, if any, to impose. The maximum is $2,000, Smith said.

Smith said business owners have asked if they could avoid a suspension of their alcohol licenses. Before February’s change in the law, city leaders had no other option.

“Time will tell if you want to use that and to what degree,” he added.

When a business is accused of violating the city’s alcohol laws, its owner appears before the ACC for a hearing. Police stings are the cause of most of the hearings, Smith said.

A May 2012 sting led to 16 hearings. Three hearings happened in October, making a total of 19 for the year, Smith said.
Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
quacker
|
March 26, 2013
Alcohol is a drug. If it came to the market today, it would be classified as a narcotic.

While I would agree the ACC is somewhat draconian, how should we control its existence?
cp66
|
March 26, 2013
There is a reason some of these licensees never leave comments. There comments fall on deaf ears!! The ACC has been known to be unfair, they change punishments on a whim. Why do big retailers get a pass because they supposedly have a employee training policy and a small owner operated store is punished for the same crime. The big store even with there training broke the law! They just bring in more money to the city. Also why not punish the underaged person trying to purchase alcohol, maybe a $2000 fine to the parents of these idiots. The store is held accountable not the person doing the crime!
anabelle_lee
|
March 26, 2013
cp66 the reason that the person buying alcohol that is underage is never charged is because the police are the ones that send them to buy the alcohol. About once a year, they do one of their little stings. The police and the ACC seem to think that this is a little game. They forget who they work for I guess. They all need to get real jobs and see how it is to have someone sitting around thinking up new "punishments" or stings to trap them while they are trying to make a living.
Trelicious
|
March 26, 2013
Your definition of "trap" must be very loose. Underage person either doesn't have i.d. or produces an i.d. that clearly shows they are underage, don't sell to them, that simple. They do not use 19 year olds who loook like they're 50, and they do not use fake i.d.s

I've waited tables before and I carded everyone, even if they were 70. Most thought it was hilarious, a few didn't like it, but I was never arrested. It's really a simple process to prevent this from happening, greed and laziness sometimes get in the way of following the rules.
anabelle_lee
|
March 21, 2013
Why aren't there ever any comments from the people that this will effect. If there are not any Alcohol license holders at the meetings, why not ask them to comment. What is this, the all-powerful alcohol commission with no opposition
3rdRock
|
March 21, 2013
Yes, it would be nice to see comments from those affected by ANY of the decisions the city makes, the state makes, or even the federal government makes. I've noticed hardly anyone takes the time to comment on RNT. Other "newspaper" sites seem to have a plethora of commentators. I wonder why that is?? Hmmm...
dalton75
|
March 21, 2013
I suppose they don't care how the alcohol commission's plans could "AFFECT" them or they would attend the meetings and offer an opinion. With this bunch, I would think that flying under the radar might be the best policy. Don't get on their "list" of businesses they want to run off.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.