Barron Stadium and Maddox Track closed because of 'surface issues'
by Lauren Jones, Staff Writer
Aug 21, 2012 | 10226 views | 29 29 comments | 10 10 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Barron Stadium track seen Monday, August 20, 2012. (Daniel Varnado RN-T)
Barron Stadium track seen Monday, August 20, 2012. (Daniel Varnado RN-T)
slideshow
Barron Stadium track seen Monday, August 20, 2012. (Daniel Varnado RN-T)
Barron Stadium track seen Monday, August 20, 2012. (Daniel Varnado RN-T)
slideshow
The Rome-Floyd Parks and Recreation Authority has decided to close Barron Stadium and Maddox Track to the public after RFPRA officials noticed some issues with the track’s surface, Director Richard Garland said during the organization’s meeting on Monday.

“The top rubber granular that they used in the top coating of the track appears to be breaking down,” Garland said as he showed photos of the melting track to the board members. “The track surface is coming off on the bottom of your shoes.”

Garland said he has contacted the contractor to repair

the track, which has an eight-year warranty, as soon as possible.

“We have made contact with the general contractor, which is Brassfield and Gorrie,” Garland said. “Matt Smith of Brassfield and Gorrie told me today the supplies to get the resurfacing done have been ordered. Their initial plan is to flood the surface again and use a different supplier for the granular rubber. They’ll basically give us the top layer of the track, and flood the whole thing for another layer.”

Garland said all scheduled events will continue at Barron Stadium, but the public won’t be able to utilize the track until the problems are resolved.

“We will still host the Rome High School, Shorter University and Rome Middle School football games,” he said. “Those will be the only activities we will have on the track until it is repaired.”

Both Garland and Chairman Jerry Lee said they hope the repairs will be finished by the end of October.

“The warmer the weather, the better the adhesion and getting it installed is going to be, because, if we wait too long, we’re looking at spring time before we get it done,” Lee said. “So far, I think we’ve done what we can do to protect our interests. It’s incumbent for us and the city to push this along as fast as we can.”

In other action, the RFPRA approved to adopt the finance committee’s recommendation to use $14,000 from the county capital reserve funds to help purchase a new truck.

An employee was involved in a wreck a few weeks ago and totaled a 2003 model F-250 cab crew truck. The insurance company reimbursed a little more than $8,000 for the truck. The authority plans to add $14,000 from the reserve funds to buy a 2012 F-250 model.
Comments
(29)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
AncientRoman
|
August 23, 2012
Berry is building its own stadium and track on the campus.
Almost_Anonymous
|
August 23, 2012
Didn't Shorter pay for some of the cost of the stadium and track upgrades? Or does it just lease the facilities?

Ditto the city schools -- did they chip in any money to the RFPRA for the improvements? Or do they just lease the facilities?

Does anyone know what it costs to lease the stadium and track for an event? $100? $1000? $10000?

If they're not spending much to lease the stadium and track then that raises the question as to why they'd have priority on their use.
TheSeer
|
August 23, 2012
According to Rome News-Tribune archives, Shorter College offered to pay $400,000 toward the improvements but the Rec Authority turned the contribution. I think Rome High School and Shorter University each pay at least $3,000 every time they use the Stafium for games and $200 an hour when they use the track for practice. That is serious money.
Almost_Anonymous
|
August 23, 2012
Do they pay all that money upfront before the season? Before each game? After the season?

Also, do any of those teams practice there or do they all practice on their own campuses?

Finally, if they do practice there, can others walk on the track then (assuming they're practicing on the field and not the track)?

Thanks
Almost_Anonymous
|
August 23, 2012
Sometimes I've seen the lights on and it's seemed like nobody's been there -- any idea as to how much the lights cost?

Or are the lights on for walkers?
Almost_Anonymous
|
August 23, 2012
If 3 football teams play games there (Shorter, Rome Middle and Rome High) and they each pay $3000/game, then the RFPRA's lucky to clear $60,000 -- before paying the operating expenses (lights, etc.)

Am I missing some events? School track?

What's the RFPRA clearing after expenses, do you reckon? A LOT of money went into that stadium and track -- how long will it take to get paid back at these rates?

Or was this always meant to be a civic-improvement that didn't necessarily fully pay for itself?
Almost_Anonymous
|
August 23, 2012
One final question: Berry College -- are they going to use this stadium or build their own. If they're building their own, how much are they spending?

Thanks!
Almost_Anonymous
|
August 23, 2012
"Why is it anyone's business how they collect the fees and when they collect the fees as long as the fees are collected?"

"... as long as the fees are collected." Folks are saying around town that Shorter's getting slow to pay its bills to local businesses. I don't know if these rumors apply to the government, too, or just businesses. I don't even know if this is true or not; I hope it's not but I've heard it multiple times.
rootytooty
|
August 23, 2012
Maybe the work crew laying the track down didn't see the fine print: "For indoor use only."
Trelicious
|
August 23, 2012
Police cars, heavy equipment and paving roads - We say NO.

Astroturf, inferior running track, and treadmills for Armuchee - We say YES.

I guess this community is proof that the theory of "The whole is greater than the sum of its parts" is a flawed theory. We are getting our just desserts.

TheMorrigan, please clarify that the front porch swing costs $3 million, that the person who buys it is not authorized to use it in the first year, and then must ask permission to use it in the following years. Please also clarify that if a religious nut is willing to pay for use of the front porch swing for 3 hours on Saturday, the front porch swing homeowner is kicked out of his house for the entire weekend.
themorrigan
|
August 22, 2012
What a bunch of whiny children.

Why can't anyone just say it's a shame Brasfield & Gorrie didn't do it right the first time, but at least they're going to fix it without a lawsuit or something?

And what would you say if someone insisted on swinging on your porch swing until you get out the tools to stabilize the loose ceiling bolt?

Because that's our track you selfishly want to damage further. And Rosebush, at least, would probably sue the porch swing owner if it fell.

Sheesh.

Rosebush
|
August 23, 2012
No, I am not into the game of suing. I would be upset, but it would be silly and a waste of time, energy, and resources to go so far for a pair of shoes, even expensive ones. The intent of my comment was the same as yours – the need to get the problem corrected being the first order of business.
Rosebush
|
August 21, 2012
From the article: “The track surface is coming off on the bottom of your shoes.” If I had paid good money for a really good pair of walking shoes, I would be very upset. If it was still open to the public with a warning notice, I would walk elsewhere regardless of the price of my shoes.
MaxPower
|
August 21, 2012
This is all B S !

There is no reason why the people should be kept off that track till time for the repair.

The RFPRA has not wonted the tax payers that payed for that track on it sense it was resurfaced. If the tax payers cant be on that track till its resurfaced , Then No One should Be On It!

The people will end up having to Go Get an Court order from a judge to keep RFPRA in line on this .
TheSeer
|
August 21, 2012
1. Why would you want to walk on a track while it is being repaired?

2. The only events being allowed in the stadium during this time are football games. Those games don't involve use of the track except for the incidental walking by teams between the locker rooms and the field. There are contracts with those schools under which those schools are paying for and are using the stadium for those games.
chieftrojan
|
August 21, 2012
so you're saying that georgia can't have a track because its HOT here??? so there can't be a track in arizona, because that's just hotter than anywhere i've ever been. the track is for everyone, but i don't want to be out there and have 4.5 million dollars on my shoes, unless it's actual money. let's let the city and parks and rec just fix the thing so we can deal with more pressing matters, like the publix that hasn't materialized yet.
heffalump
|
August 21, 2012
Maybe coat the track with a product not so likely to melt in this heat we have here. Repairing in Oct is warmer weather?
TheSeer
|
August 21, 2012
The article said the repairs will be finished by the end of October. That is certainly warmer than November, December, January, February or early March.
Icarus10
|
August 21, 2012
There are a 100 great places to run and walk around Rome, leave the track for the athletes.
MaxPower
|
August 23, 2012
Icarus10

The athletes did not pay for that track , We did !!

How many people do you think would have voted for that s.p.l.o.s.t if they new the public were going to be done like this ?

Its time for Garland and many others to Go !
sgreen181
|
August 21, 2012
They need to realize who paid for the track. Its not theirs, it's ours!!!!
TheSeer
|
August 21, 2012
That makes too much sense. Irrational people don't want to hear rational comments.
comeonman
|
August 22, 2012
With that rationale, why don't you go take a spin in a cop car? Or use the use the public library tonight at midnight? They are also both yours.
AlphaXYZ
|
August 20, 2012
Whoa!!! Wait a minute. Have Price & Dowless, over at Shorter, obtained signed Lifesyle Agreements with the owner of the contracting firm and all of his/her employees?

We certainly don't want the ultra-pure Shorter folks standing on, or using, a track surface built by sinners.
AbsoluteMind
|
August 23, 2012
More important than that, how good are the signed Lifestyle Agreements signed by the coaches and staff?

Wonder if Dowless and company would like to sit down and talk about it over a drink?
Almost_Anonymous
|
August 24, 2012
AbsoluteMind wrote:

"More important than that, how good are the signed Lifestyle Agreements signed by the coaches and staff?"

Why wouldn't these agreements not be any good? Has anyone heard anything to the contrary?
TheSeer
|
August 20, 2012
Read the article. It says the issue is with the contractor.
MistahROME
|
August 20, 2012
No the article says "track SURFACE issues" and will be closed until"the surface issues can be addressed with the contractor.

Trelicious
|
August 20, 2012
Splost.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.