Deputy resigns amid GBI probe
by Lauren Jones, Staff Writer
May 30, 2012 | 9411 views | 4 4 comments | 30 30 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Rick Nelson
Rick Nelson
slideshow
Floyd County Sheriff’s Deputy Rick Nelson resigned Tuesday, and the Georgia Bureau of Investigation has been looking into a recent arrest he was involved in, said Sheriff Tim Burkhalter and Chief Deputy Tom Caldwell.

“He came up and resigned to Caldwell this morning,” said Burkhalter.

Caldwell said Nelson resigned after working with the sheriff’s office for about seven years.

“It may be a little more or less than seven, but it’s somewhere around there,” said Caldwell. “I don’t know why he resigned.”

Though Caldwell could not confirm for what reasons Nelson resigned, he did say there was an internal investigation being conducted in reference to an arrest Nelson and another deputy made.

“It involves an arrest he made with another deputy,” Caldwell said.

Caldwell did say the arrest in question prompted the sheriff’s office to involve the GBI.

“I called GBI last week about it,” Burkhalter said.

Caldwell likewise said the GBI is conducting an investigation into circumstances surrounding the arrest.

“The GBI is doing an investigation and there are some details they’re looking into,” he said, adding that he could not confirm which arrest is being investigated because he didn’t “have the facts in front of him” at the time.

Caldwell said he didn’t know why Nelson resigned, but that it was not uncommon.

“I simply don’t know, he did most of the talking and I did the listening,” he said. “He’d been thinking about it for a while. It’s a personal decision, not forced. It was just something that was time for him to do.”

The Rome News-Tribune made efforts to reach Nelson for comment for this report, but he was not accepting calls on his cell phone.
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
coosatown
|
May 31, 2012
I have never had any dealings with the Sheriff's Office to be positive or negative of current administration. Therefore, I lean toward positive, considering the budgetary constraints (manpower, equipment, etc.) We are getting what we pay for. No more, no less. If a former CIA, Secret Service or FBI agent were elected Sheriff, the employee pool would remain the same.
The_Source
|
May 31, 2012
Why do you infer that there needs to be a change at the Sheriff's Office? Because Sheriff Burkhalter has transparency at his department? Burkhalter did not try to hide this misconduct or anyone else's, as a matter of fact, I believe he hit it head on and addressed the situation properly.

But your right AnotherPatriot, we need change at the Sheriff Office, and I am sure that you think Cary Cooper is that change that Floyd County needs. Cooper will make tons of changes I am sure.

Cooper for Change

1.) Will lose CALEA standards and take the department back thirty years. CALEA is not something that is easily attainable and you have to pass over 150 points of inspection. It is not something that you are "given" it has to be earned!

2.) Will do away with the many community programs started by Burkhalter, included but not limited to; CHAMPS Program, Are You Ok?, ADAP Program, Sheriff Santa Program, Sheriff Santa for Seniors Program, the meth classes he teaches for the parents, etc. etc. etc.

Somebody ask Cooper what kind of change he plans on implementing, please, I beg you to ask him. Rome News call him up and ask him some of these important questions, if you're not too scared. After hearing his radio interview a few weeks ago you may have to decipher through a bunch of uh, duh, um, hmm, well, ah, mm's, mumbles, and what not's but hopefully you will eventually get that answer.

As for me, I think Tim and Tom have done a great job in turning the Sheriff's Office around and into something this county can be proud of. Burkhalter gets my vote!

BURKHALTER 2012 !!!

AnotherPatriot
|
May 31, 2012
First off, The_Source, you have not seen me endorse anyone. I simply stated I feel change is needed and that change could be with the current administration. Secondly, you can tout all the community programs you'd like and I'm still not impressed. You can also rave over CALEA and I'm definitely NOT impressed. If you understood the real workings behind an accreditation program, you'd know it truly has very little meaning in the grand scheme of things. As a former accreditation manager for a state agency, yep, not a county agency but an entire state, I can tell you that in all reality, it's useless, meaningless, and is another cost to taxpayers who couldn't tell you the first thing about what they've paid for. How many readers even knew it cost them for the Sheriff's Office to be accredited? And what is their return on this investment? A better operated jail? Quicker service of civil warrants? That money could have better been put to use by improving/fixing structural and security matters at the jail. As "the source", I'd like to see you post factual figures indicating the benefit from these community programs. You can't ramble on about your unwavering support and not be able to justify your position. If so, I'd say that was selective transparency.
AnotherPatriot
|
May 30, 2012
Now someone convince me change isn't needed at the Sheriff's Office.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.