Permit review for 17 stores caught in alcohol sting tonight
by Diane Wagner, staff writer
May 29, 2012 | 6604 views | 6 6 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
(File photo)
(File photo)
slideshow
Rome’s Alcohol Control Commission will have hearings tonight on 17 stores cited for selling to minors in an undercover city police operation in April.

Additionally, La Scala restaurant at 413 Broad St. is slated to respond to an underage sales citation issued in a state sting this month.

Local officials said on May 21 they were unaware of the state action, but a hearing is scheduled on the ACC’s agenda posted Friday. No local citations were issued and details of the state operation were not immediately available.

The board’s meeting at 5 p.m. in City Hall, 601 Broad St., is open to the public.

The ACC also is expected to grant a new beer package license to Jay’s Salvage, 1301 Shorter Ave., and new beer, wine and liquor package license at Southern Pride Liquor, 2875 New Calhoun Hwy.

Buenavista Mexican Cantina, at 707 Turner McCall Blvd., also is asking for permits to serve beer, wine and liquor.

Suspensions possible

Tonight will be the second offense for two of the stores caught up in the city sting.

The ACC issued a letter of warning in August 2010 to Kroger at 1476 Turner McCall Blvd. A two-day suspension was levied against Super Food Mart, 304 S. Broad St., at the same time.

Penalties for first offenses can range from a warning to a three-day suspension of sales.

Repeated offenses could possibly result in penalties as high as a 10-day suspension or revocation of the license.

The Rome City Commission, however, has been divided about sanctions for businesses whose employees violate the city ordinance.

A December 2010 debate about penalties — the most recent regarding a sting operation — lasted three hours and ended without consensus.

In the latest sting, conducted April 25, Rome police detectives sent three underage agents into 63 stores to try to buy alcohol.

Clerks who did not ask for identification were issued separate citations to appear in Rome Municipal Court. Fines for the violations are $405 each, and the ACC has typically been more lenient with owners who fire the employees involved.

Stores cited for first offenses

ACC hearings deal only with the ability to hold an alcohol sales permit. The stores cited for first offenses are:

  • CVS Pharmacy, 1201 Turner McCall Blvd.

  • Kmart and Kmart Express, 102 Hicks Dr.

  • Kangaroo Express, 1501 Martha Berry Blvd.

  • Kangaroo Express, 910 N. Broad St.

  • Kangaroo Express, 1425 Turner McCall Blvd.

  • Rick’s Food Mart, 2000 N. Broad St.

  • Market on 2nd, 401 E. Second St.

  • Maple Street Quick Stop, 1912 Maple Ave.

  • Tazo Food Mart, 618 Calhoun Ave.

  • Coastal Food Mart, 1701 Turner McCall Blvd.

  • Calhoun Ave. Quick Stop, 1120 Calhoun Ave.

  • Texaco, 507 Turner McCall Blvd.

  • Ark’s Liquor, 432 Shorter Ave.

  • Chastain’s Beverage, 1416 N. Broad St.
  • Comments
    (6)
    Comments-icon Post a Comment
    anchor67
    |
    May 30, 2012
    MrRome you are so right about the buy outs by the Patel's
    appalucy
    |
    May 31, 2012
    Have a problem with a successful family? Go start a business and put in the elbow grease. I don't even know this family but there was a time when business owners were lauded.

    I definitely think that the seller (clerk) needs to be held accountable even more than the business owner (unless of course, the clerk can show he was instructed otherwise.)
    dwaina
    |
    May 31, 2012
    Patel is a name identifying the land of India they came from. Not their real last names.
    Prossarian
    |
    May 29, 2012
    Seems to be some repeat offenders that have been caught multiple times. The ACC needs to get serious and make an example of the repeat offenders. How about a 1 year suspension when caught the first time followed by permanent revocation if caught again!
    tedb3rd
    |
    May 29, 2012
    They can't do that! Think of the tax revenue implications of that?!
    MisterROME
    |
    May 29, 2012
    I think one year might be a little hard for first offense but a couple months would be hard on them.Then one year for second offense .Either way I'd be happy.It would not hurt tax revenue,their customers would go to another local store and get what they wanted. Then another Patel would buy his cousin or brother out and they would be back in business.
    Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.