Sparks fly at town hall about 411 Connector
by Diane Wagner, staff writer
Nov 30, 2012 | 6554 views | 2 2 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Debate grew slightly heated Thursday at a Rome Tea Party town hall on the proposed U.S. 411 Connector that drew about 40 people to Grace Bible Church in Armuchee.

Tom K. Perdue, a consultant for the Rollins family, presented a detailed argument for revising the selected route. The new 6.34-mile highway would traverse the family’s 1,800-acre Cartersville ranch to link U.S. 411 from Rome to Interstate 75.

“I’m not here to try to get anyone to agree on something. I’m just trying to start a discussion. … We’re trying to stop a route, not a road,” Perdue said.

Rome City Commissioner Buzz Wachsteter and several Greater Rome Chamber of Commerce members unsuccessfully sought to have the presentation deferred to a date when a representative from the Georgia Department of Transportation could attend.

Wachsteter told Tea Party Chairwoman Diane Coker and organizer Mike Morton that it was unfair to offer a professional opponent’s view without a counterpoint from a professional who selected the route.

But Coker said attempts to line up a supporter fell through and a GDOT engineer would be invited to a future gathering.

“It’s been 30 years and we’re still waiting on that Connector, so we’ve still got time to hear from — if you want to put it that way — the other side,” she said.

The audience appeared evenly divided during the question-and-answer period, with a number of speakers suggesting a new road may not be needed at all.

Chamber member Ansley Saville was one of several, however, who said industries look for routes that don’t force their delivery tractor-trailers into gas-burning starts and stops.

“The bottom line here is jobs,” she said. “They might as well be throwing dollar bills out the window every time they gear down.”

An in-depth report about the pros and cons of the selected route will appear in Sunday’s Rome News-Tribune.
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Ihatepolitics
|
November 30, 2012
I thought one of the central tenets of Tea Party supporters was smaller government. So why doesn't the Tea Party support No Road? If industry wants to save money by not having to gear down, let's build a toll road so that users (not the taxpayers who don't drive the stretch or who don't care about a few red lights) pay the bill.
Ihatepolitics
|
November 30, 2012
On re-reading the article, I noticed that a number of speakers do endorse no road. That is consistency (and pragmatism).
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.