Study: Less religious states give less to charity
by JAY LINDSAY,Associated Press
Aug 20, 2012 | 2870 views | 8 8 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In this Saturday, Dec. 19, 2009 photo, John Alves, of Dartmouth, Mass., uses a basket while taking collection during Mass at St. John the Baptist Roman Catholic Church in New Bedford, Mass. A study on the generosity of Americans, released Monday, Aug. 20, 2012, by the Chronicle of Philanthropy, found that states with populations that are less religious are also the stingiest about giving money to charity. (AP Photo/Gretchen Ertl)
In this Saturday, Dec. 19, 2009 photo, John Alves, of Dartmouth, Mass., uses a basket while taking collection during Mass at St. John the Baptist Roman Catholic Church in New Bedford, Mass. A study on the generosity of Americans, released Monday, Aug. 20, 2012, by the Chronicle of Philanthropy, found that states with populations that are less religious are also the stingiest about giving money to charity. (AP Photo/Gretchen Ertl)
slideshow
BOSTON (AP) — A new study on the generosity of Americans suggests that states with the least religious residents are also the stingiest about giving money to charity.

The study released Monday by the Chronicle of Philanthropy found that residents in states where religious participation is higher than the rest of the nation, particularly in the South, gave the greatest percentage of their discretionary income to charity.

The Northeast, with lower religious participation, was the least generous to charities, with the six New England states filling the last six slots among the 50 states.

The study also found that patterns of charitable giving are colored in political reds and blues.

Of the 10 least generous states, nine voted for Democrat Barack Obama for president in the last election. By contrast, of the 10 most generous states, eight voted for Republican John McCain.

But Peter Panepento, the Chronicle's assistant managing editor, said that political breakdown likely speaks to a state's religious makeup, not its prevailing political views. He noted the lowest-ranked Democrat states were also among the least religious, while the top-ranked Republican states were among the more religious.

"I don't know if I could go out and say it's a complete Republican-Democrat difference as much as it is different religious attitudes and culture in these states," he said.

The study was based on Internal Revenue Service records of people who itemized deductions in 2008, the most recent year statistics were available.

By focusing on the percentage given to charity from discretionary income — the money left over after necessities are paid for — the study aimed to remove variables such as the differing costs of living around the country, Panepento said. The data allowed researchers to detail charitable giving down to the ZIP code, he said.

The most generous state was Utah, where residents gave 10.6 percent of their discretionary income to charity. Next were Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee and South Carolina. The least generous was New Hampshire, at 2.5 percent, followed by Maine, Vermont, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.

In Boston, semi-retired carpenter Stephen Cremins said the traditional New England ideal of self-sufficiency might explain the lower giving, particularly during tight times when people have less to spare.

"Charity begins at home. I'm a big believer of that, you know, you have to take care of yourself before you can help others," Cremins said.

The study found that in the Northeast region, including New England, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New York, people gave 4.1 percent of their discretionary income to charity. The percentage was 5.2 percent in the Southern states, a region from Texas east to Delaware and Florida, and including most of the so-called Bible Belt.

The Bible mandates a 10 percent annual donation, or tithe, to the church, and the donation is commonly preached as a way to thank God, care for others and show faith in God's provision. But it has a greater emphasis in some faiths.

In Mormon teachings, for instance, Latter Day Saints are required to pay a 10 percent tithe to remain church members in good standing, which helps explain the high giving rate in heavily-Mormon Utah.

"Any LDS member who is faithful does that," said Valerie Mason, 70, of Mesa, Ariz., during an interview in Salt Lake City. "Some struggle with it. Some leave the church because of it. But we believe in the blessing. ... Tithing does bring the blessing of God's promise."

Alan Wolfe, a political science professor at Boston College, said it's wrong to link a state's religious makeup with its generosity. People in less religious states are giving in a different way by being more willing to pay higher taxes so the government can equitably distribute superior benefits, Wolfe said. And the distribution is based purely on need, rather than religious affiliation or other variables, said Wolfe, also head of the college's Boisi Center for Religion and Public Life.

Wolfe said people in less religious states "view the tax money they're paying not as something that's forced upon them, but as a recognition that they belong with everyone else, that they're citizens in the common good. ... I think people here believe that when they pay their taxes, they're being altruistic."

Among other notable findings of the study:

— People who earn $200,000 per year give a greater percentage to charity when they live in ZIP codes with fewer people who are as wealthy as they are.

— People who earn between $50,000 and $75,000 annually give a higher percentage of their income to charity (7.6 percent) than those who make $100,000 or more (4.2 percent).

____

Associated Press writers Lindsey Anderson and Rodrique Ngowi in Boston and Lynn DeBruin in Salt Lake City, Utah, contributed to this report.
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
jarnoldcr
|
August 21, 2012
Somewhere a generous New Englander is talking with his tax consultant about how to write off his speeding tickets as a charitable contribution to the Fraternal Order of the Police.
lmorri43
|
August 20, 2012
I have a question...A friend of mine told me this and I was too lazy to look it up...Why do bible belt states finish toward the bottom in the followiing categories...teen pregnancy, literacy, std's, household income, health insured, SAT scores, obesity...Seems like the more churches your state has, the more likely it is to be in poor health.
lmorri43
|
August 21, 2012
@crawfish

I am actually a conservative concerned with why the south struggles in the categories I listed...what I gathered from your reply was...well your probably right but its more fun to divert the conversation toward your political ideology. Do you believe bible belt states finish in the top, middle, or bottom of states when it comes to SAT scores...or any other category I listed related to poverty. My guess is you too will not go look it up because you know the answer.
KingPellinore
|
August 21, 2012
You'll get used to crawfish, lmorri43. But bear in mind, if you disagree with him it means you're a liberal. ;-)
MmmHmm
|
August 22, 2012
More than likely it's because the southeastern U.S. is the most poor and least educated region in the country. It always has been and more than likely always will be. More than likely, it goes all the way back to the first settlers in the region. Georgia, for instance, was a penal colony, basically, those who were deemed criminals or simply worthless by England. Then Civil War years and when that was all over, the southeast was devistated and all those that had money and educations moved north. Leaving behind those that couldn't leave. After 250 or so years (a long time when looking at lifespans, but nothing when factoring generations), the majority of desendents of these people are still here. Still struggling for a better life and unfortunately, still not figuring out how to make things better. No slight against anyone, or anythning like that. I think its just a slow evolution of life in the south.
81Jeep
|
August 20, 2012
considering this

"The study was based on Internal Revenue Service records of people who itemized deductions in 2008, the most recent year statistics were available."

That includes tithes to church as giving to charity.

I bet if the amount given to churches was not counted (sorry churches are not charitable institutions) the numbers would be greatly different.
TheSeer
|
August 20, 2012
I beg to differ with you. The biggest givers to the homeless shelters, the food pantries, the Free Clinic and the other charitable endeavors in Rome are the churches, primarily the large downtown churches.
SillyRoman
|
August 21, 2012
TheSeer,

If giving to churches that help the poor counts as charity, then paying taxes to the government that issues food stamps and health care should count as charity as well...
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.