Barry just gets louder
Mar 21, 2011 | 2333 views | 13 13 comments | 31 31 recommendations | email to a friend | print
From the Rome News-Tribune, 03/22/11 --

THE BARRY Loudermilk that Floyd Countians helped to send to the Georgia Senate is not the Barry Loudermilk today representing them and serving them so poorly.

The Loudermilk who ran, and was endorsed by this newspaper, did so on a strong record in the Georgia House where he promoted the free-enterprise system and defended personal freedoms against the growing encroachments of “the nanny state.”

It was probably expected by most voters, in a time when the state has acute economic, budgetary and service-delivery problems, that he would apply his head for business and his belief in “the American way” of individual resourcefulness to those conditions and help right the ship of state.

It certainly was no secret that Loudermilk, R-Cassville, is strongly pro-life, as are many in this region with varying intensity and lots of ifs, buts and except-fors that the senator seems not to share. It is similarly no secret that this newspaper has long been pro-choice, favors full equal rights for everybody, supports civil unions conferring complete familial rights, advocates the legalization (and taxation) of marijuana and any number of other things that probably cause Loudermilk’s trademark close-cropped hair to curl.

SO WHAT? Those things are not about managing public affairs and monies; they are about people being allowed to live their individual lives, make their own choices with the least amount of political interference or “guidance.” Loudermilk often talks that talk himself ... but he clearly does not walk that walk.

Despite his fondness for flag-waving and use of the nebulous code term “family values,” it was not expected — and certainly wasn’t the theme of his campaign — that he would focus on two things: opposing the federal government on about everything in the name of state’s rights and stopping abortion.

Frankly, the federal government is not all that bad ... when comparing it to the current state government. And if Loudermilk doesn’t want an abortion performed on himself ... fine, despite the scientific novelty such would involve. If he wants to control another person’s body ... not so fine.

For whatever reasons, Loudermilk has now decided to become the poster boy of the right-to-life movement to the exclusion of attempting to serve his constituents by, let’s say, trying to stop Northwest Georgia Regional Hospital from being closed, kicking the pests of the Orkin empire out of the right-of-way for the U.S. 411 Connector, keeping the HOPE scholarships intact, getting the state and its unfunded mandates out of our lives and so forth.

MAYBE HE already envisions a future run for higher office and needs what he believes is a statewide base of support and funding; perhaps he has been stricken with a missionary zeal better applied in a religious setting. Whatever it is, he has torn off on a tack that has largely left the people of his Floyd/Bartow/Gordon district without a voice on everything that actually matters in the here and now.

To this point, Loudermilk has, with publicity trumpets blaring, offered a constitutional amendment that would confer personhood with full rights from conception forward and thus make both abortion and stem-cell research homicide; attempted to limit abortions only to within hospitals (almost all are done in specialized clinics); sought to void any abortion coverage in health-insurance policies; and is trying to permit pretty near anyone to sue a doctor for damages if he performs the procedure without following every nitpicking regulation the state might be able to think up.

The first three aren’t going anywhere in this session. The fourth, SB 210, actually the most ludicrous and insulting, passed the Senate, 36-16, and now depends on the saner heads in the House to stop.

LOUDERMILK must be a good buddy of the tin-pot dictators now running the Senate in the same manner that former Speaker Glenn Richardson once ran the House when it was the senators alone who retained their sanity. Under the Gold Dome, lunacy resulting from an overdose of power is apparently contagious. He got this through the Rules Committee without public hearings or examination by the Judiciary Committee in which its huge failings would have been detected. That is pretty much unheard of.

First of all, it is worth noting that this measure would allow damage lawsuits for the “full value of the life of an unborn child” by any interested party even if all consent forms have been signed by the mother. This is more than parents who lost a wanted child because a physician actually botched something up can currently sue for. Some may recall that Loudermilk’s predecessor, Sen. Preston Smith, R-Rome, ill-advisedly and poorly rewrote the malpractice laws and slapped on damage limits that apparently would not apply in this case.

Incredibly — actually, the entire measure is incredible — Loudermilk states that “some party” feeling aggrieved could sue, not just the woman. As Sen. Emanuel Jones, D-Decatur, correctly but futilely pointed out: “This is the rapists’ bill of rights.”

Heck, an incestuous father could sue as well. So, for that matter, would any pro-life advocacy group be “some party.”

Loudermilk vows to get this corrected but misses the point entirely. This is none of the state government’s business or concern in the first place.

EVERY governmental power claimed has a flip side. If politicians can deny abortion then they similarly can, as China’s government once did, mandate abortion for population control. Our service members today — and Loudermilk was once in those ranks — even today are fighting the Taliban and other Muslim extremists who seek to impose draconian religious beliefs on those who by right (remember all that “endowed by their Creator” stuff?) are free to make their own choices, have or not have children, speak freely or bite their tongues, own guns to protect themselves and so forth.

It is the abuse of rights, not the rights themselves, that can be addressed as a common concern.

That Loudermilk seems not to grasp this is more than disappointing. It is dangerous.

Another preening and posturing politician is the least of all the many things this nation, this state, this county need at the moment.

Comments
(13)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
FormerRoman
|
March 24, 2011
ipaytaxes, those tax credits are chump change..

A business will hire people when it needs them to complete their orders in a timely manner,not for a tax break..

If confidence in the economic recovery is sustained, then they will hire..They don't want to hire someone and have to cut them loose 6-12 months later.

Too many variables in this equation yet to be decided..Healthcare,oil prices, and Mideast turmoil.
soldier315
|
March 24, 2011
Voter: Seems to me that if you were right, Loudermilk would not be in office right now, now would he? Who is horribly uninformed?
soldier315
|
March 24, 2011
Yes, and we see how happy the Country is in who they elected president. His approval ratings are not so hot. The most recent Rasmussen poll shows him at a whopping 26% approval. If I am reading that correctly, I don't believe that is a majority of the people who are happy with the liberal way he is running this country.

You said he "doesn't "stands for what he believes in" but what will get him elected. If the public view changes direction then so will he." Could you please elaborate? I understand that you love throwing the accusations around, but I don't think you can back it up. I certainly have not seen any sign of this statement being even the slightest bit valid.

And as far as work to help the unemployment problem, how about the sponsorship of HB 1023 and HB 1024 last year(just to name a few of the top bills he has worked on regarding job growth). Oh I know, you would rather him "stimulate" the economy and job growth by throwing all of our tax dollars at failing companies! That'll do the trick. It's worked for our President...right?

themorrigan
|
March 24, 2011
Some of us who voted for him thought we would be getting jobs, not the secessionists' dream.

Georgia is a receiver state in terms of federal money, which means we get more than we pay in. Imagine what this mess would look like without the financial back-up.

Now imagine it under Loudermilk's scenario of your in-laws deciding if you can even have a glass of wine. Unfortunately, not an exaggeration -- Combine his bill protecting the health of an "unborn child" from the moment of conception with the impossibility of knowing exactly when conception occurs and you'd better not be planning anything risky (or frisky) for a couple months after you have sex.

It's a sad state of affairs when Georgians NEED the federal government to protect our civil rights.
soldier315
|
March 24, 2011
Mipoco: I love how you write your comments as if you personally hold the views of the entire district (or the entire State for that matter). As you are well aware, you are indeed in the minority in regards to your left-wing views. I know, you are going to deny that fact, but it would not be hard to understand if you would look beyond your own little world that you live in. You certainly have the right to speak your mind and that is why our country is so great. But it has been made perfectly clear through your MANY comments that you do not hold to the values the that the majority of people in this district do (or this State).

I would like to know how you, if put in his position, would plan on making every single person happy in the entire district? It sounds as if this is what you want from him. His principles have been clear from the very beginning of his first run for public office, and they have not changed. I do not fully support many politicians; but I support Barry Loudermilk because he stands for what he believes in.

And yes, in my opinion, he does a terrific job of representing this district.
peachy321
|
March 23, 2011
The "us" referred to is probably the 75 percent of the voters in this district who voted for Senator Loudermilk.

And he does he does a good job of representing those who didn't vote for him as well.
Dolemite
|
March 23, 2011
For the record (and per the applicable federal government agencies), it won't take years to complete any studies for the small modified section of Route D-VE. It would take months. The lawsuit will take several years, and that's if the GDOT wins - which is looking more difficult by the day. I blame GDOT and elected officials. They had a chance to do this right in late 80s and failed on a number of levels. Also, the road only has (now) around $22 million from feds. The rest will be made up courtesy of you - via a possible TSPLOST or GDOT funding... Hence one of the main reasons they're looking at a revised section of D-VE. Nevertheless, I hope something gets built.
PhilHenry
|
March 23, 2011
Seriously, this could be the stupidest sentence ever to appear in the RN-T: "Frankly, the federal government is not all that bad ... when comparing it to the current state government."

I definitely don't agree with Loudermilk's constant attack on the availability of abortion, but everything else he has done has been in the people's best interests. The 411 Connector is tied up in the red tape of the federal government you say is so great. We could consider another route to side-step the Rollins' inevitable lawsuits, but that requires years of EPA studies that have already been completed for route D-VE. As a state senator, there's not much Loudermilk can do to speed up a project relying on federal funding.

Maybe your time would be better spent taking the Rollins' to task for constantly delaying the project in order to protect their weekend retreat. The road would have been built years ago at a much lower cost without their resistance.
teadm
|
March 22, 2011
Read the article again...for the contradictions...

Thanks for the great job Senator!

peachy321
|
March 22, 2011
Thank you to Senator Loudermilk for representing us well!

This article just brings out the wacko views of this paper, and how stupid they think we voters are. It has been obvious all along what you stand for and we also know that you are focusing on more than just this issue.

You do a great job of representing all of your district, including business (SR 68), 2nd amendment issues (SB 98), as well as constitutional issues (SB 61) and much more.

Thanks for looking out for us!
factsforfree
|
March 22, 2011
Barry Loudermilk loves to call himself a "Constitutionalist" and quote Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. He preaches LESS government with every breath he takes. Yet he want to empower the government to decide for women if they can have an abortion. Quite hyprcritical, I would say.I'm probably as Pro-Life as Barry, but it's not his job to push his religious beliefs upon others. After all, Christians don't answer to Barry Loudermilk.

As for the rest of his antics, Barry seems to love to champion anything that panders to the ultra right-wing wackos, and anything that gets him on the 6 o'clock news. Red Light camers, incandescent light bulbs, and now reviving the abortion debate. Come'on Barry. Try solving some real issues like water, roads and education. While you were pandering to the wackos, did you notice the State closed N.W. Georgia Regional Hospital and put over 800 of your constituants out of work? Did you notice Floyd County has one of the highest unemployment rates in Georgia?

The bottom line is this. Rome and Floyd County got what it deserved. Despite having 60% of the vote, we sat back and allowed Bartow County to take OUR Senate seat. The best candidate we could offer up was some guy named "Sweet Reason"? Give me a break! Where is all of the future leaders that the Chamber of Commerce was developing with "Leadership Rome"?

When communities sit back on their collective rear-ends, it's folks like Barry Loudermilk that get the microphone.

Dolemite
|
March 22, 2011
Would be nice if Loudermilk would push GDOT to modify the connector so we could have the road sooner, cheaper, etc. In case he doesn't realize, he does have some power to help his constituents.
marmc57
|
March 22, 2011
This article is ridiculous and has too many holes in its points to be believed. The 'kicker' for me was, "Frankly, the federal government is not all that bad ... when comparing it to the current state government."

RN-T is proud of its Pro-Choice stance, yet supported Senator Loudermilk, when his position on abortion has been clear since his first run for Representative?

Slow news day? Publishing this kind of thing makes me wonder if it isn't an early April Fool's joke.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.