DDA approves $35,000 for demolition of Broad and Third Avenue property
by Doug Walker, Associate Editor
May 10, 2012 | 3788 views | 3 3 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Plan for parking area on East Third Avenue and Broad Street.
download 2B30_Downtownparkingplan.pdf
The old Top Hat building on Broad Street is owned by Ira Levy. (Daniel Varnado, RN-T.com)
The old Top Hat building on Broad Street is owned by Ira Levy. (Daniel Varnado, RN-T.com)
slideshow
Plans to demolish three old buildings at the corner of Third Avenue and Broad Street and to replace them, at least temporarily, with a parking lot cleared one hurdle Thursday and will face another next Wednesday.

The Downtown Development Authority approved the contribution of $20,000 toward demolition of the old Top Hat and Bible Book Store, along with another $15,000 for the construction of a parking lot that would create at least 19 new spaces at that corner. The Historic Preservation Commission will review the proposal next Wednesday afternoon.

The $35,000 comes from a pool of $60,000 that the Business Improvement District allocated for major improvements to downtown properties in 2012.

Ira Levy, who owns the property, will lease the lot back to the city for $1 a year for three years. DDA Executive Director Ann Arnold said that after three years, Levy would hopefully have financing in place to move forward with the construction of a multi-story, mixed-use retail and residential development on the site.

The Historic Preservation Commission approved Levy’s project, with modifications, last year. Those modifications, which would have required Levy to remove balconies overhanging the Broad Street façade, were not acceptable to Levy, so the project has been on hold ever since.

Ann Pullen cast the lone

dissenting vote regarding the $15,000 for the parking lot.

“I’m very concerned about giving $35,000 to one project,” Pullen said. “That is more than half of our $60,000 budget.”

Levy said he would know more after the Historic Preservation Commission meeting next week.

“I’m normally opposed to tearing down buildings, but this is an exception,” Arnold said. “A parking lot is not the highest and best use of that corner. It’s a temporary fix.”

The preliminary budget for the demolition is approximately $65,000, so the cost of demolition to Levy would be about $45,000.

The estimated budget for the parking lot development is $31,000. Anything above the $15,000 grant approved Thursday will come from the DDA parking management account.

The upside for Levy is that after three years, if he has financing for his mixed-use project, the property will already have a solid foundation.

Board member Jay Shell said that even if the property were a parking lot for 10 years it would be better than what is there now.

Alice Herring, a DDA Board member whose Ford, Gittings & Kane Jewelers is a neighbor to the property, said her business was absolutely in favor of the plan.

“It would help our restaurants a lot,” she said of the parking. “It’s a lot better than what we have now.”

The new parking lot, coupled with the existing parking behind the buildings, would create a total of 41 parking spaces that would be managed by the Downtown Development Authority. There has been no discussion yet if those spaces would be open to the public.

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
VJ
|
May 12, 2012
What about the unsightly lot on the corner of 2nd and Broad St. Does anyone know what happen with that? The parking deck on the corner of 5th and Broad St. is that private parking? I hardely ever see it full. I just hate to see a another building come down and nothing happens to the lot or the public can't even use it.
Romanlife
|
May 11, 2012
Hopefully in three years he can build the multi- use building as planned with balconies. Just like they had in the same location years ago.

And parking problem could be improved if instead of giving parking tickets, they would put a boot on the vehicle of anyone that gets x number of parking tickets on Broad Street per year. As now too many inconsiderate downtown employees are just happy to take up convenient parking from customers and are fine with paying the fines. If it were made more inconvenient with use of the boot, many may start choosing the deck instead.

And many thanks to Ira Levy for always working to make downtown Rome better for all.
tedb3rd
|
May 10, 2012
Why don't people just park across the river and use the new pedestrian bridge that has (and will) bring in so much revenue and jobs?!!?

Oh wait, people are too lazy to walk to get to a store or forum... especially when it's hot, cold, or possibly going to drizzle. Which leaves the pedestrian bridge remotely useful about 20 days a year for about 50 people.

Rome DDA and other planning committees: Evidence-based excellence!

I say tear it down, build a prison and make it exclusively for local representatives that support spending (at tax-payer's expense) on projects that later turn out to operate in the red at a cost to the community. Like the pedestrian bridge.. Like the forum... Like the tennis courts that are coming... and like the Lowe's distribution center.

(Yes, Lowes... Saw an article in AJC that discussed how big businesses brought in by bribes like Lowes end up costing the community when it's all said/done. ...The TRUE bottom line. It said the only projects that break even are HUGE like Kia down in West Georgia...and even that's not much for them.)
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.