Law may force counties to give gun sale revenue to state
Jun 17, 2012 | 3851 views | 8 8 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Irwin Bagwell
Irwin Bagwell
slideshow
A law that goes into effect July 1 may force counties to turn over the proceeds of surplus and confiscated weapon sales to Georgia’s state treasury.

Senate Bill 350 sets new rules for agencies disposing of guns that have been used in crimes, abandoned or are no longer needed.

It allows “municipal corporations” to put revenue from the sales into their general funds. In other cases, the money goes to the state.

“It looks to us like the law’s unclear when it comes to counties,” said Beth Brown of the Association County Commissioners of Georgia. “We’re not considered a municipal corporation — that’s traditionally meant cities — and we’re not considered a state agency.”

Brown said the Georgia Sheriffs’ Association thinks counties will have to give up the funds; two attorneys offered conflicting interpretations; and the Georgia General Assembly’s legislative counsel couldn’t settle the issue.

“It did not specifically address what counties should do,” she said. “Our guidance to counties is to decide if they want to handle it the way they’ve been doing or to put the money in the state’s general fund.”

The Floyd County Commission is rushing through an auction of confiscated weapons before the new law takes effect. The money will be used to offset police operations.

Commission Chairman Irwin Bagwell said SB 350 continues a General Assembly trend of forcing mandates on local governments

while limiting their ability to raise revenue.

“They’re taking more money away from the counties,” he said.

Commissioner Garry Fricks noted that the board reminds state lawmakers every year to consider the local impact of proposed legislation.

“They’re chipping away at all the small things, under the radar, but it all adds up,” Fricks said.

SB 350 passed 115-54 in the House and 49-4 in the Senate. It was supported by all five of Floyd County’s delegates: state Sen. Barry Loudermilk, R-Cassville, and state Reps. Katie Dempsey, R-Rome; Barbara Massey Reece, D-Menlo; Christian Coomer, R-Cartersville; and Rick Crawford, D-Cedartown.

The measure states that the agency must first try to find the rightful owner of a confiscated gun, and return it if the owner is innocent.

Auctions — to licensed firearms dealers, collectors, importers or manufacturers — must be scheduled at least every six months if the agency has an inventory of forfeited guns.

Link to the Senate Bill 350 webpage
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Rome1978
|
June 20, 2012
Where do they list the auction dates/times? Seems like something I would like to go to.
npcomaster
|
June 20, 2012
The county canceled the sale Tuesday, until the state clarifies the law. There's an update here.

They sell a lot of their surplus property on govdeals.com, though, and that was one of the places they had intended to list the guns.
Enforcer
|
June 19, 2012
I read the bill and I did not see where it said that agencies would have to give the money to the state. If anyone else reads it let me know if I missed it and where it was written.
Letsbefriendly
|
June 18, 2012
I wonder if this will limit the things they confiscate. More time and paperwork and less pay for it. I could see local enforcement saying, "Don't take the time to do anything we don't have too." To be so wise sometimes they over look how most people will react.
rootytooty
|
June 17, 2012
These GA Republicans preach "local government" out the wazoo...meaningless blather.
Enforcer
|
June 19, 2012
What does the Democrats that voted for it preach?
Enforcer
|
June 19, 2012
This bill was sponsored by 2 Democrats and 2 Republicans.
anotherpoint
|
June 17, 2012
Am I missing something or has all five of our local Representatives for this area turned their back on our local government by voting to take away, what should be, a protected means of revenue? Revenue that helps the local government not have to ask for more tax money from the citizens. Although the sale of the confiscated items isn't going to be a tremendous amount, the point is our community's local law enforcement confiscated these items from criminals, not the state! Our taxes paid those law enforcement salaries while they were confiscating these seized items, now we have to give the proceeds to the state. What king of Representative would do this? What's your opinions?
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.