Despite protests, Boy Scouts reaffirm ban on gays
by DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
Jul 17, 2012 | 1723 views | 4 4 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
In this Saturday, May 21, 2011 file photo, Robert Mazzuca, Chief Scout Executive of the Boy Scouts of America, speaks to a gathering of Boy Scouts during ceremonies at New Jersey's Boy Scouts Camporee in Sea Girt, N.J. After a confidential two-year review, the Boy Scouts of America on Tuesday, July 17, 2012 emphatically reaffirmed its policy of excluding gays, ruling out any changes despite relentless protest campaigns by some critics. "The vast majority of the parents of youth we serve value their right to address issues of same-sex orientation within their family, with spiritual advisers and at the appropriate time and in the right setting," Mazzuca said. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)
In this Saturday, May 21, 2011 file photo, Robert Mazzuca, Chief Scout Executive of the Boy Scouts of America, speaks to a gathering of Boy Scouts during ceremonies at New Jersey's Boy Scouts Camporee in Sea Girt, N.J. After a confidential two-year review, the Boy Scouts of America on Tuesday, July 17, 2012 emphatically reaffirmed its policy of excluding gays, ruling out any changes despite relentless protest campaigns by some critics. "The vast majority of the parents of youth we serve value their right to address issues of same-sex orientation within their family, with spiritual advisers and at the appropriate time and in the right setting," Mazzuca said. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)
slideshow
NEW YORK (AP) — After a confidential two-year review, the Boy Scouts of America on Tuesday emphatically reaffirmed its policy of excluding gays, angering critics who hoped that relentless protest campaigns might lead to change.

The Scouts cited support from parents as a key reason for keeping the policy and expressed hope that the prolonged debate over it might now subside. Bitter reactions from gay-rights activists suggested that result was unlikely.

The Scouts' national spokesman, Deron Smith, told The Associated Press that an 11-member special committee, formed discreetly by top Scout leaders in 2010, came to the conclusion that the exclusion policy "is absolutely the best policy" for the 112-year-old organization.

Smith said the committee, comprised of professional scout executives and adult volunteers, was unanimous in its conclusion — preserving a long-standing policy that was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2000 and has remained controversial ever since.

As a result of the committee's decision, the Scouts' national executive board will take no further action on a resolution submitted at its recent national conference asking for reconsideration of the membership policy.

The Scouts' chief executive, Bob Mazzuca, contended that most Scout families support the policy, which applies to both adult leaders and Scouts.

"The vast majority of the parents of youth we serve value their right to address issues of same-sex orientation within their family, with spiritual advisers and at the appropriate time and in the right setting," Mazzuca said. "We fully understand that no single policy will accommodate the many diverse views among our membership or society."

The president of the largest U.S. gay-rights group, Chad Griffin of the Human Rights Campaign, depicted the Scouts' decision as "a missed opportunity of colossal proportions."

"With the country moving toward inclusion, the leaders of the Boy Scouts of America have instead sent a message to young people that only some of them are valued," he said. "They've chosen to teach division and intolerance."

Darlene Nipper, deputy executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, said the Scouts "have turned their backs on a chance to demonstrate fairness, exercise sound judgment, and serve as a role model for valuing others."

The Scouts did not identify the members of the special committee that studied the issue, but said in a statement that they represented "a diversity of perspectives and opinions."

"The review included forthright and candid conversation and extensive research and evaluations — both from within Scouting and from outside of the organization," the statement said.

The announcement suggests that hurdles may be high for a couple of members of the national executive board — Ernst & Young CEO James Turley and AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson — who have recently indicated they would try to work from within to change the membership policy. Both of their companies have been commended by gay-rights groups for gay-friendly employment policies.

Stephenson is on track to become president of the Scouts' national board in 2014, and will likely face continued pressure from gay-rights groups to try to end the exclusion policy. Asked for comment on Tuesday about the Scouts' decision to keep the policy, AT&T did not refer to Stephenson's situation specifically.

"We don't agree with every policy of every organization we support, nor would we expect them to agree with us on everything," the company said. "Our belief is that change at any organization must come from within to be successful and sustainable."

A statement from the executive committee of the Scouts' national executive board alluded to the Turley-Stephenson developments.

"Scouting believes that good people can personally disagree on this topic and still work together to achieve the life-changing benefits to youth through Scouting," the statement said. "While not all board members may personally agree with this policy, and may choose a different direction for their own organizations, BSA leadership agrees this is the best policy for the organization."

Since 2000, the Boy Scouts have been targeted with numerous protest campaigns and run afoul of some local nondiscrimination laws because of the membership policy.

One ongoing protest campaign involves Jennifer Tyrrell, the Ohio mother of a 7-year-old Cub Scout who was ousted as a den mother because she is lesbian.

Change.org, an online forum supporting activist causes, says more than 300,000 people have signed its petition urging the Scouts to reinstate Tyrrell and abandon the exclusion policy. The petition is to be delivered to the Scouts' national headquarters in Irving, Texas, on Wednesday.

Eagle Scout Zach Wahls, an Iowa college student who was raised by lesbian mothers, said Tuesday's announcement didn't change his view that eventually the Scouts would relent under pressure from campaigns such as those that he and his allies have mounted.

"I'm sure they'll keep saying this until the day they decide to change the policy," said Wahls.

He contended that the committee review process should not have been kept secret. "The very first value of the Scout Law is that a Scout is trustworthy," Wahls said. "There is absolutely nothing trustworthy about unelected and unnamed committee members who are unwilling to take responsibility for their actions."

The Boy Scouts' policy stands in contrast to inclusive membership policies adopted by several other major youth organizations, including the Girl Scouts of the USA and Camp Fire.
Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Bevans1974
|
July 17, 2012
jarnoldcr... i have no problem with them excluding people who dont share their views. The problem i have is them using facilities paid for by the tax dollars of all the citizens (including the ones they want to exclude) instead of facilities paid for only by their members or people who share their views.

When they use churches and other private facilities they are well within their rights to discriminate, but when using public facilities they should conform to the anti-discrimination laws.

jarnoldcr
|
July 18, 2012
Hi Bevans,

Thanks for the reply. Can you point to the particular anti-discrimination law that may apply to the Boy Scouts using public facilities? For example, I can't see the Employment Non-Discrimination Act applying here, because they are not seeking employment, rather they are only seeking access to facilities offered to the general public. Additionally, this law only protects sexual orientation and identity in a handful of states.
Bevans1974
|
July 17, 2012
The Boy Scouts are a private organization so they should be allowed to say who or who cannot be a member. The problem arises when they want to use public facilities to promote their organization.

For years they have been allowed to use schools and other places paid for by taxpayers to hold their meetings and hold recruitment drives. I remember as a young man them coming into the schools seeking new scouts. Since they continue to want to be a private organization who can exclude whoever they want them they shouldn't be allowed to use facilities paid for with public tax dollars.

They should really take a lesson from the Girls Scouts who are inclusive to anyone wants to join.
jarnoldcr
|
July 17, 2012
Hi Bevans,

I would gently suggest that there may be a fallacy in your wisdom here. Your concern is that Boy Scouts exclude others who do not share their values. Your remedy is for the public to exclude them for not sharing the majority view of tolerance and inclusion [shared by some, but certainly not all]. Whatever happened to the "government will make no law prohibiting the free exercise of speech and religion?" It seems what you are suggesting here is view point discrimination. Encouraging government to exercise its power by forcing citizens to accept and conform to the majority viewpoint is a dangerous double-edged sword. Today you may be on the giving end of it...tomorrow you may be its recipient. I'm just not sure if it is helpful to combat one type of perceived discrimination with another.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.